Temporary Credit for
First-time Homebuyers
The
recent American Housing Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008
(Housing Act) created a temporary credit to encourage home ownership.
This new credit is for first-time homebuyers and can be as large as $7,500
($3,750 for those who use married filing separate status), but is limited
to 10% of the home's purchase price.
Eligibility
for the credit is limited to those who have not owned a principal residence
in the U.S. during the three-year period that ends on the purchase date.
In the case of a married couple, both spouses must pass this test.
The credit is generally available
for a principal residence purchased after April 8, 2008, and before July
I, 2009. In the case of a newly constructed home, the purchase date is
considered to be the date the taxpayer moves in.
Qualified
homebuyers should note there are significant drawbacks with this credit.
It is phased-out or completely eliminated if the taxpayer's modified adjusted
gross income (MAGI) is too high. The phase-out range for married joint
filers is between MAGI of $150,000 and $170,000 ($75,000 and $95,000 for
unmarried individuals and married individuals who file separately). In
addition, the taxpayer must repay the credit amount (without interest)
over 15 years starting with the second year after the year the credit
is claimed. Each year's repayment amount is treated as an addition to
the homeowner's tax liability for that year. (So, the credit really functions
as an interest-free loan.)
If the home is sold, or if
the taxpayer stops using it as the principal residence before the credit
has been repaid, an accelerated repayment rule may apply. If so, the unpaid
credit balance must be paid with the individual's tax return for the year
when the triggering event occurs. However, the amount due under the accelerated
repayment rule cannot exceed the gain from selling the home to a third
party if such a sale is the triggering event.
Please call us if you have
questions about the new credit, how to compute your MAGI, or any other tax planning or compliance
issue.
Tax Calendar
October 15-Personal returns that received
an automatic six-month extension must be filed today and any tax, interest,
and penalties due must be paid.
-Partnerships that received
an additional six-month extension must file their Forms 1065 today.
October
31-The
third quarter Form 941 (Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return) is due
today and any undeposited tax must be deposited. (If your tax liability
is less than $2,500, you can pay it in full with a timely filed return.)
If you deposited the tax for the quarter in full and on time, you have
until November 10 to file the return.
-If you have employees, a federal
unemployment tax (FUTA) deposit is due if the FUTA liability through September
exceeds $500.
December 15-Calendar-year corporations
must deposit the fourth installment of estimated income tax for 2008.
Temporary Property Tax Deduction for Non-itemizers
Thanks to a provision in the
recent Housing Act, for 2008 only, an unmarried taxpayer who doesn't itemize
can add up to $500 of state and local real property taxes to his or her
"normal" standard deduction amount. Married joint filers can
add up to $1,000 to their standard deduction.
Among those who will benefit
from this new provision are retired homeowners who don't itemize deductions
because they no longer have deductible mortgage interest, but are still
subject to state and local real property taxes on their homes.
New Online Payment Reporting Requirement
Congress is concerned that businesses
are evading billions of dollars in taxes by not reporting or underreporting electronic (e.g., credit card) sales transactions.
To collect lost tax revenue attributable to these transactions, legislators
included a provision in the recently enacted Housing Act. It will require
credit and debit card issuers and third-party settlement organizations
to report sales-related information to the IRS.
Beginning in 2011, the new
law will require debit and credit card issuers and electronic payment
processors like PayPal to file aggregate transaction reports with the
IRS. Information that must be reported includes the gross amount paid
to the merchant during the year along with the merchant's name, address,
and taxpayer identification number (TIN). Starting in 2012, back-up withholding
at 28% will apply if the bank or payment organization doesn't have the
merchant’s TIN. Card issuers will be required to provide a copy of the
report to the business.
Mandatory reporting will not
go into effect until 2011, giving banks and other reporting organizations
time to gear up for these new requirements. When fully implemented, this
new law gives the IRS a way to compare what the bank or reporting organization
is paying a business with what the business is reporting on its tax return.
The new reporting requirements are expected to generate nearly $10 billion
in additional tax revenue over a 10-year period.
Changes to
the Home Sale Gain Exclusion
Many taxpayers bought a second
home, such as a vacation home, with the intention of later converting
the second home into their principal residence. Under pre2008 Housing
Act law, those taxpayers could have excluded up to $250,000 ($500,000
for certain joint filers) upon a later sale of that former vacation home
as long as the two-year ownership and use tests for the exclusion were
satisfied. However, the Housing Act recently changed the method for recognizing
post 2008 gain on the sale of a principal residence formerly used as a
vacation or second home.
Specifically, the new rule
makes a portion of the gain from selling the residence, the nonqualified
use period, ineligible for the gain exclusion privilege. A property's
nonqualified use period equals the amount of time after 2008 during which
the property is not used as the taxpayer's principal residence. However,
periods of nonqualified use don't include temporary absences that aggregate
to two years or less due to changes of employment, health conditions,
or other unforeseen circumstances to be specified in future IRS guidance.
Example 1: Nonqualified use
leads to additional taxes.
Floyd bought a vacation home
in an exclusive area on January 1, 2005. On January 1, 2011, he converts
the property into his principal residence, and he and his wife live there
for all of 2011 and 2012. On January 1, 2013, he sells the home for a
$450,000 gain. Floyd's total ownership period is eight years (2005-2012).
However, the two years of post-2005 use as a vacation home (2009-2010)
count against him and result in a nonexcludable gain of $112,500 (2/8
x $450,000). Floyd must report the $112,500 as capital gain income on
his 2013 federal tax return and pay the resulting federal income tax.
If Floyd files jointly, he won't owe any federal income tax on the remaining
$337,500 of gain ($450,000 $112,500) because it's completely sheltered
by the exclusion.
Example 2: Nonqualified use
has no impact.
Sandy, a single person, bought
a vacation home on January 1, 2001. On January 1, 2011, she converts the
property into her principal residence and lives there for all of 2011
and 2012. On January 1, 2013, she sells the home for a $360,000 gain.
Sandy's total ownership period is 12 years (2001-2012), but the two years
of post-2008 use as a vacation home (2009-2010) result in a nonexcludable
gain of $60,000 (2/12 x $360,000). Sandy can claim the $250,000 home sale
gain exclusion against the remaining $300,000 ($360,000 - $60,000) gain,
leaving a $50,000 taxable gain. The end result is that Sandy must report
a total gain of $110,000 (the nonexcludable gain of $60,000, plus the
$50,000 gain in excess of the home sale gain exclusion).
Even before the new nonexcludable
gain rule, Sandy would have had to report taxable gain of $110,000 ($360,000
- $250,000). Since the $110,000 gain that she would have had to report
anyway exceeds the $60,000 nonexcludable gain, the new nonexcludable gain
rule has no impact on Sandy.
To minimize the amount of taxable
gain from the sale of one of these homes, it is essential that taxpayers
keep accurate records of all the money invested in home improvements (before
and after it became the taxpayer's principal residence).
Please call us to discuss this
important provision and what might be done prior to year-end.
Payments
in Lieu of Dividends
Some investors with margin accounts
may get an
unpleasant surprise at tax time. When the owner of stock lends that stock to a short seller who
uses it to cover a short sale, any dividends paid while the loan is outstanding
will be sent to the short seller's buyer. To compensate the lender of
the stock for any missed dividends, the short seller pays him or her substitute
payments in lieu of dividends. This is extremely important because these
substitute payments are not actually dividends, do not qualify for the
reduced tax rate (15% maximum), and could be taxed at a rate as high as
35%.
Example: Payments in lieu of
dividends.
Merryl's margin account with
Super Brokers holds 500 shares of Best Bank, Inc., her only investment.
Barney, also a customer of Super Brokers, owns no Best Bank stock, but
wants to sell 500 shares short. He believes Best Bank's stock price will
fall, and he will be able to cover his short position profitably. To facilitate
the short sale on January 2, 2008, Super Brokers borrows 500 shares of
Best Bank stock from Merryl's account and sells it in Barney's account.
On October 1, 2008, Barney covers his short position and the Best Bank
stock is restored to Merryl's account. Merryl was unaware of these transactions.
During 2008, Best Bank declares
and pays quarterly dividends of $1 per share on Merryl’s stock totaling
$2,000 (500 shares x $1 x 4 quarters) for the year. While the short sale
was open, Barney was required to pay Merryl substitute payments totaling
$1,500 (500 shares x $1 x 3 quarters). In January 2009, Merryl will receive
a statement from Super Brokers indicating that, in 2008, she received
$500 in qualified dividends and $1,500 in substitute payments in lieu
of dividends. The substitute payments are not eligible for qualified dividend
treatment and the 15% maximum tax rate; they may be taxed as high as 35%.
Planning Tip: Most standard brokerage agreements
allow the broker to lend out stock held in a margin account. Investors
may be unaware that their stock was loaned, since it did not affect the
amount of quarterly payments they received. Taxpayers with dividend-paying
stocks in a margin account should consider rescinding their permission
to loan their shares or consider moving those stocks to a cash account
to avoid this issue.
The
Tax and Business Alert is designed to provide accurate information regarding
the subject matter covered. However, before completing any significant
transactions based on the information contained herein, please contact
us for advice on how the information applies in your specific situation.
Tax and Business Alert is a trademark used herein under license.
© Copyright 2008
|